Architecture lettering or font is meant to be practiced in professional usage by Architects. This was a mandatory course in Architecture education. Presently, it is not so in some institutions whereas in some universities it remains a mandatory subject or part of the curriculum. 

Students or Professionals who question why would I have to go through this, who and since when people started doing this, why should I change my lettering or handwriting, I am no longer drafting, it is all digitalised, WHY EVEN NOW?

Answers to all your questions are here.

We live in a digital era with fast-paced work nature using technological advancements. Changing color schemes or designs or materials will take you time to accomplish with desired results. Even then it’s way quicker than early days. In the early days of Architecture, without digital tools and technologies, one had to make drawing sheets manually. Making or composing sheets is not only about drafting drawings but also dimensioning and adding sheet template, title, and narrative. When it comes to writing, in addition to the usual writing factor as legibility, one other factor was crucial. Uniformity. Sometimes multiple people work as a team on the same blueprint (similar to present day IFC in BIM).

Sample image with four different font styles

Imagine each one’s different handwriting on a single sheet.

One could be small, big, legible or unclear. In order to have a clear understanding of the text, architectural fonts were used. Even though it was an age old practice, I would vote for Francis D.K. Ching for his contribution towards architecture fonts or lettering. Because his handwritten notes and his books Architecture Graphics and Form, Space and Order published in 1975 in architecture lettering are the biggest influence even today. Every student for sure relies on at least one of his many books.

Recent editions of digital prints have an architecture font called Tekton which is entirely developed from Ching’s handwritten architecture lettering.

Image showing a page in Ching’s book

So, you could also say “we have digital architecture fonts too, why waste time in practicing this lettering?” We use digital tools and technology advancements. Still, when we explain to clients or want to make a simple sketch and add title or specifications, are we gonna rush to get a digital tool?

I would like to remind you of one thing which one of my professors insists and I agree with. “Mouse (or Apple Pencil or digital pens) can’t do what our hand and brain can do together” 

Writing or scribbling manually captivates your brain to concentrate and improves your memory, critical thinking. I don’t think practising architectural font will be a waste of time. It will pay you off with

and a gentle reminder of relying on your hands more. 


  1. good thought process and nicely written! Best Wishes! Very apt and thoughtful for the current scenario of architectural practice in the first part of 21st century!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you… I also felt the need to be told in this digital era.


  2. Manual work has its benefits even in a digital world. Having gone through a short (and shallow) architecture course as common curriculum during my higher studies, I didn’t have the chance to ponder much about lettering. Your thoughts on uniformity make much sense.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I am delighted to know that you get to explore Architecture in your curriculum. Thank you for adding your thoughts.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: